Before consciousness

I am always honest, and I did read your book. It has many problems. Maybe no more than the big bang theory does, but that is plenty. For one thing, it is not proven that the Universe had a beginning, for another, it is not proven that there is just and only one Universe. "Beon" "Aeon" are just words you made up, and have no more scientific basis than your "God" or "Geon" terms do.

It seems there are only 3 options logically:

1.. Physical and Conscious were 'forever' separate.
2.. Conscious somehow magically arises from the physical.
3.. The Physical is an illusion of non-conscious: all is actually conscious.

1 is static and suggests an un-moving state of static non-interactive solipsis
2 is at best random and without form - it defies probability
3 allows the idea that 1 & 2 can be observed as illusions themselves

4... ?