When different lines of thought meet.

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: When different lines of thought meet.

Post by Jonathan Ainsley Bain on Mon Oct 26, 2015 1:58 pm

If you think that math and computer algorithm are not much the same
then you probably think one can take the square root of a negative number.

My point is that almost all of math, especially calculus is obsolescent
in the light of computer programming.

All my results are available as downloadable software.
If you had read properly you would see that.

There is also a text account of how they were constructed,
so anyone capable of writing such software will be able to replicate them.
If I published the code it would promote copy-paste theorists,
and be counter-productive from the point of promoting authentic analysis.

The notion of quantum-time becomes central to how any evolutionary software
must be constructed. Calculus assumes infinitely divisible vectors and this is
wholly at odds with the very essence of a quantum universe.

This is why algorithms will always be better than pencil-and-paper math
for any applied math solution.

Last I looked at your website it claimed that your web-designer had died.

But I did not judge it on the basis that you made the error of claiming
that the universe was (a mere) 13.7 years old.

If someone with your attitude had read your website, they would similarly dismiss it
with the same impatience you project.

HTML is a simple computer language, but it can be integrated with many other packages.
(As I demonstrate.) Well done on taking the next step. The event-timer is your next challenge.

I am not aware of any of your questions which you allude to in your rant.

But thanks for inadvertently admitting that such topics are at the core
of the psychological dissonance which clearly vexes your spirit,
and which has markedly increased as a result of my response.

So on the one had you claim I am incapable of understanding therefore am invited to join?
How did you get those two ideas in your head at the same time?

You would do well to catch yourself in mid-rant, and then re-examine your thoughts
until your psyche is in a state of emotional harmony.

An authoritarian demeanor such as yours suggests an inability to control
your base urges. Perhaps you should not be so hard on yourself?

If you project aggression, it will come back to you.
Do you not want to live in peace?

Aggression is impatience. You are impatient with your inner urges,
and thus you project that impatient aggression outwards.
Having understood this, it does not bother me if you choose to
use me as an emotional punch-bag.

When you get to the other side of it, you will see what I mean.

God Bless.

;-j
avatar
Jonathan Ainsley Bain
forum physicist

Posts : 185
Join date : 2015-05-24
Age : 47
Location : Africa

View user profile http://www.flight-light-and-spin.com/

Back to top Go down

Our diverse perspectives

Post by greylorn on Wed Oct 28, 2015 10:08 pm

@Jonathan Ainsley Bain wrote:If you think that math and computer algorithm are not much the same
then you probably think one can take the square root of a negative number.

My point is that almost all of math, especially calculus is obsolescent
in the light of computer programming.

All my results are available as downloadable software.
If you had read properly you would see that.

There is also a text account of how they were constructed,
so anyone capable of writing such software will be able to replicate them.
If I published the code it would promote copy-paste theorists,
and be counter-productive from the point of promoting authentic analysis.

The notion of quantum-time becomes central to how any evolutionary software
must be constructed. Calculus assumes infinitely divisible vectors and this is
wholly at odds with the very essence of a quantum universe.

This is why algorithms will always be better than pencil-and-paper math
for any applied math solution.

Last I looked at your website it claimed that your web-designer had died.

But I did not judge it on the basis that you made the error of claiming
that the universe was (a mere) 13.7 years old.

If someone with your attitude had read your website, they would similarly dismiss it
with the same impatience you project.

HTML is a simple computer language, but it can be integrated with many other packages.
(As I demonstrate.) Well done on taking the next step. The event-timer is your next challenge.

I am not aware of any of your questions which you allude to in your rant.

But thanks for inadvertently admitting that such topics are at the core
of the psychological dissonance which clearly vexes your spirit,
and which has markedly increased as a result of my response.

So on the one had you claim I am incapable of understanding therefore am invited to join?
How did you get those two ideas in your head at the same time?

You would do well to catch yourself in mid-rant, and then re-examine your thoughts
until your psyche is in a state of emotional harmony.

An authoritarian demeanor such as yours suggests an inability to control
your base urges. Perhaps you should not be so hard on yourself?

If you project aggression, it will come back to you.
Do you not want to live in peace?

Aggression is impatience. You are impatient with your inner urges,
and thus you project that impatient aggression outwards.
Having understood this, it does not bother me if you choose to
use me as an emotional punch-bag.

When you get to the other side of it, you will see what I mean.

God Bless.

;-j
Jonathan,
You are a somewhat interesting character.  Although you are as dreadfully confused about the reality of existence as most people, you keep coming back as if you actually know something useful.

You do know some intermediate methodologies, the techniques required to get along in whatever society you find yourself in.  

Like most individuals who have learned to get along, you've adapted by parroting the bullshit that your chosen societal-set has adopted.  I keep hoping for original insights, but I'm not going to put anything on hold waiting for them.  

WTF, at least you're engaging a bit of time on a mickey mouse blog acting as if you're engaging interesting ideas.  It's a start.  Maybe next lifetime you'll actually step up and propose an interesting idea of you own.  Or, maybe not.  

I can see what you mean without dying, i.e. "going to the other side."   Fucking shmoo-talk.  Why not simply gather up enough intellectual integrity to write "dying?"  And that's a rhetorical question, since you don't have enough intellectual integrity to gather up into anything.  You keep reiterating the religious crap you've learned.  So long as you come from that dreadful pile of religious horseshit, the best you'll be is atop that pile.  Enjoy the aromas.  

For awhile I've been thinking that you might have a conscious mind that is sufficiently non-programmed to be worth engaging, but I find that you are incapable of distinguishing the difference between mathematics and algorithms.  

I misread your capabilities.  I apologize.

_________________
Greylorn
avatar
greylorn

Posts : 100
Join date : 2015-07-11
Location : Arizona

View user profile http://beon-cpt.com

Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum