What I calculated years ago:
Page 1 of 1
What I calculated years ago:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn27570-supernova-space-bullets-could-have-seeded-earths-iron-core.html?utm_source=NSNS&utm_medium=SOC&utm_campaign=hoot&cmpid=SOC%7CNSNS%7C2015-GLOBAL-twitter#.VV5o3fmqqko
That is what I've been saying for years!
http://www.flight-light-and-spin.com/how-solar-system-formed.htm
Hell that is both annoying and exciting at the same time.
Whats more is that I have the reason that the star goes nova.
Its because it increases its spin, and the amount it is spinning
causes the centrifugal force to eventually become
stronger than the force of gravity.
But WHY does it increase its spin?
Two reasons:
1) as it condenses its spin increases.
and
2) because an object that increases its velocity does not increase
its mass as relativity tells us, but it starts to spin more:
See here:
http://www.flight-light-and-spin.com/relativity-revised.htm
That is what I've been saying for years!
http://www.flight-light-and-spin.com/how-solar-system-formed.htm
Hell that is both annoying and exciting at the same time.
Whats more is that I have the reason that the star goes nova.
Its because it increases its spin, and the amount it is spinning
causes the centrifugal force to eventually become
stronger than the force of gravity.
But WHY does it increase its spin?
Two reasons:
1) as it condenses its spin increases.
and
2) because an object that increases its velocity does not increase
its mass as relativity tells us, but it starts to spin more:
See here:
http://www.flight-light-and-spin.com/relativity-revised.htm
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|